Image not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 976 vs Rome 475C
RomeModel B
Rome 475C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 475 hp
- displacement
- 1,100 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 976
vs
RomeRome 475C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 475C higher · +115 hp (+32%)976360 hp
475C475 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
976 is in the 96th percentile; 475C is in the 98th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 475C higher · +245 ci (+29%)976855 ci
475C1,100 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
976 is in the 97th percentile; 475C is in the 99th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 475C higher · +2 (+33%)9766
475C8
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
976 is in the 74th percentile; 475C is in the 99th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied97612
475C12
Median Agricultural Tractor16
976 is in the 33rd percentile; 475C is in the 33rd · 972 models
976 (A)475C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Rome | — |
| Model | 976 | 475C | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | NTA-855-A360 | 3408 | — |
| Power Output | 360hp | 475hp | ▲ 475C+115 hp · +32% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ 475C+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 855ci | 1,100ci | ▲ 475C+245 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 5.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 260in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 125in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 21,100lb | 33,000lb | ▲ 475C+11,900 lb · +56% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 976 | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (360 hp)B · 98th percentile (475 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 97th percentile (855 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,100 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (8)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 33rd percentile (12)B · 33rd percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 87th percentile (21,100 lb)B · 96th percentile (33,000 lb)
A · 976B · 475CMedian Agricultural Tractor