Head to head · Utility
Ford 9N vs John Deere 1026R
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 1026R
Utility
- power
- 25.2 hp
- displacement
- 68 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 9N
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 1026R
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1026R higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)9N25.1 hp
1026R25.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9N is in the 17th percentile; 1026R is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9N higher · +52 ci (+76%)9N120 ci
1026R68 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9N is in the 28th percentile; 1026R is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 9N higher · +1 (+33%)9N4
1026R3
Median Utility Tractor4
9N is in the 50th percentile; 1026R is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9N higher · +2,132 lb (+148%)9N3,576 lb
1026R1,444 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
9N is in the 30th percentile; 1026R is in the 5th · 5,107 models
9N (A)1026R (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | 9N | 1026R | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Ford | 3TNV76 | — |
| Power Output | 25.1hp | 25.2hp | ▲ 1026R+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,001RPM | 3,200RPM | ▲ 1026R+1,199 RPM · +60% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 9N+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 120ci | 68ci | ▲ 9N+52 ci · +76% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3in | ▲ 9N+0.2 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 3.8in | 3.2in | ▲ 9N+0.6 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | 87.4in | ▲ 9N+27.6 in · +32% |
| Width | 64in | 46.9in | ▲ 9N+17.1 in · +36% |
| Height | 52in | 78.3in | ▲ 1026R+26.3 in · +51% |
| Operating Weight | 3,576lb | 1,444lb | ▲ 9N+2,132 lb · +148% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 558rpm | 540rpm | ▲ 9N+18 rpm · +3% |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 4.00x19 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 10.00x28 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category I Limited | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 798lb | 1,430lb | ▲ 1026R+632 lb · +79% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical shoe | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3gal | 1gal | ▲ 9N+2 gal · +200% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 9N | John Deere 1026R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 17th percentile (25.1 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 28th percentile (120 ci)B · 8th percentile (68 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 30th percentile (3,576 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,444 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 20th percentile (115 in)B · 4th percentile (87.4 in)
A · 9NB · 1026RMedian Utility Tractor