
Head to head · Utility
Ford 9N vs Kubota L2250

Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota L2250
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 79.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
FordFord 9N
vs
KubotaKubota L2250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9N higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)9N25.1 hp
L225025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9N is in the 17th percentile; L2250 is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9N higher · +40.7 ci (+51%)9N120 ci
L225079.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9N is in the 28th percentile; L2250 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 9N higher · +1 (+33%)9N4
L22503
Median Utility Tractor4
9N is in the 50th percentile; L2250 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ L2250 higher · +5 (+167%)9N3
L22508
Median Utility Tractor12
9N is in the 3rd percentile; L2250 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
9N (A)L2250 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 9N | L2250 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | Ford | D1302-DI-A | — |
| Power Output | 25.1hp | 25hp | ▲ 9N+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,001RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ L2250+599 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 9N+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 120ci | 79.3ci | ▲ 9N+40.7 ci · +51% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3.2in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.8in | 3.2in | ▲ 9N+0.6 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | 8-speed | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | 108in | ▲ 9N+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 64in | 49.2in | ▲ 9N+14.8 in · +30% |
| Height | 52in | 79.5in | ▲ L2250+27.5 in · +53% |
| Operating Weight | 3,576lb | 2,170lb | ▲ 9N+1,406 lb · +65% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 4.5gpm | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual or power (optional) | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Continuous or live (optional) | — |
| Speed 1 | 558rpm | 540rpm | ▲ 9N+18 rpm · +3% |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
| Speed 3 | Not recorded | 1,080rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 4.00x19 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 10.00x28 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 798lb | 1,314lb | ▲ L2250+516 lb · +65% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual or power (optional) | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical shoe | Differential wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3gal | 1.3gal | ▲ 9N+1.7 gal · +131% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 9N | Kubota L2250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Two-post ROPS with canopy (optional) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 17th percentile (25.1 hp)B · 17th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 28th percentile (120 ci)B · 12th percentile (79.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 3rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 30th percentile (3,576 lb)B · 13th percentile (2,170 lb)
A · 9NB · L2250Median Utility Tractor