Head to head · Utility
Ford FW-35 vs Steyr 6190 CVT
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr 6190 CVT
Utility
- power
- 193 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord FW-35
vs
SteyrSteyr 6190 CVT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FW-35 higher · +2 hp (+1%)FW-35195 hp
6190 CVT193 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FW-35 is in the 94th percentile; 6190 CVT is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6190 CVT higher · +2 ci (<1%)FW-35401 ci
6190 CVT403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FW-35 is in the 90th percentile; 6190 CVT is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFW-356
6190 CVT6
Median Utility Tractor4
FW-35 is in the 93rd percentile; 6190 CVT is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ FW-35 higher · +5,573 lb (+37%)FW-3520,503 lb
6190 CVT14,930 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
FW-35 is in the 95th percentile; 6190 CVT is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
FW-35 (A)6190 CVT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford FW-35 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steyr | — |
| Model | FW-35 | 6190 CVT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford FW-35 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Sisu | — |
| Power Output | 195hp | 193hp | ▲ FW-35+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ FW-35+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 403ci | ▲ 6190 CVT+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ FW-35+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4.7in | ▲ 6190 CVT+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford FW-35 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-speed power shift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford FW-35 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 260in | 188in | ▲ FW-35+72 in · +38% |
| Width | 104in | 98in | ▲ FW-35+6 in · +6% |
| Height | 134in | 118in | ▲ FW-35+16 in · +14% |
| Operating Weight | 20,503lb | 14,930lb | ▲ FW-35+5,573 lb · +37% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford FW-35 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford FW-35 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford FW-35 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Articulated power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford FW-35 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 94th percentile (195 hp)B · 94th percentile (193 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (401 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 95th percentile (20,503 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,930 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 97th percentile (260 in)B · 92nd percentile (188 in)
A · FW-35B · 6190 CVTMedian Utility Tractor