Image not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 876 vs Ford FW-40
Image not recorded
FordFord 876
vs
FordFord FW-40
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ FW-40 higher · +15 hp (+5%)876280 hp
FW-40295 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
876 is in the 92nd percentile; FW-40 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-40 higher · +292 ci (+48%)876611 ci
FW-40903 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
876 is in the 93rd percentile; FW-40 is in the 97th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-40 higher · +2 (+33%)8766
FW-408
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
876 is in the 74th percentile; FW-40 is in the 99th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ FW-40 higher · +8 (+67%)87612
FW-4020
Median Agricultural Tractor16
876 is in the 33rd percentile; FW-40 is in the 74th · 972 models
876 (A)FW-40 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 876 | FW-40 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Cummins | Same |
| Model | LT10-A280 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 295hp | ▲ FW-40+15 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ FW-40+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ FW-40+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 611ci | 903ci | ▲ FW-40+292 ci · +48% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 5.5in | ▲ FW-40+0.6 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 4.8in | ▲ 876+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Spicer 1010 | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 260in | 267in | ▲ FW-40+7 in · +3% |
| Height | Not recorded | 134in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,100lb | 30,630lb | ▲ FW-40+12,530 lb · +69% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center load sensing | open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | articulated power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN/III | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | articulated power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volts | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 14.1gal | 16.9gal | ▲ FW-40+2.8 gal · +20% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 92nd percentile (280 hp)B · 93rd percentile (295 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (611 ci)B · 97th percentile (903 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (8)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 33rd percentile (12)B · 74th percentile (20)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 79th percentile (18,100 lb)B · 94th percentile (30,630 lb)
A · 876B · FW-40Median Agricultural Tractor