Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford FW-40 vs John Deere 8650
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 8650
Utility
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 619 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord FW-40
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8650
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FW-40 higher · +5 hp (+2%)FW-40295 hp
8650290 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FW-40 is in the 96th percentile; 8650 is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-40 higher · +284 ci (+46%)FW-40903 ci
8650619 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FW-40 is in the 98th percentile; 8650 is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-40 higher · +2 (+33%)FW-408
86506
Median Utility Tractor4
FW-40 is in the 99th percentile; 8650 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ FW-40 higher · +4 (+25%)FW-4020
865016
Median Utility Tractor12
FW-40 is in the 86th percentile; 8650 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
FW-40 (A)8650 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | FW-40 | 8650 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | John Deere | — |
| Power Output | 295hp | 290hp | ▲ FW-40+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ FW-40+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 8 | 6 | ▲ FW-40+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 903ci | 619ci | ▲ FW-40+284 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 5.1in | ▲ FW-40+0.4 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 5in | ▲ 8650+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Spicer 1010 | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 267in | 224in | ▲ FW-40+43 in · +19% |
| Height | 134in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 30,630lb | 30,270lb | ▲ FW-40+360 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Closed center constant-pressure | — |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Articulated power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent (optional) | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 9,260lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Articulated power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.9gal | 12gal | ▲ FW-40+4.9 gal · +41% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | John Deere 8650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Sound-Gard cab with air-conditioning | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (295 hp)B · 96th percentile (290 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (903 ci)B · 95th percentile (619 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (30,630 lb)B · 97th percentile (30,270 lb)
A · FW-40B · 8650Median Utility Tractor