Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford FW-40 vs Kioti DK50
FordFord FW-40
vs
KiotiKioti DK50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FW-40 higher · +246 hp (+502%)FW-40295 hp
DK5049 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FW-40 is in the 96th percentile; DK50 is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-40 higher · +781 ci (+640%)FW-40903 ci
DK50122 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FW-40 is in the 98th percentile; DK50 is in the 29th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-40 higher · +4 (+100%)FW-408
DK504
Median Utility Tractor4
FW-40 is in the 99th percentile; DK50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ FW-40 higher · +8 (+67%)FW-4020
DK5012
Median Utility Tractor12
FW-40 is in the 86th percentile; DK50 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
FW-40 (A)DK50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kioti | — |
| Model | FW-40 | DK50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4A200T | — |
| Power Output | 295hp | 49hp | ▲ FW-40+246 hp · +502% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 8 | 4 | ▲ FW-40+4 · +100% |
| Displacement | 903ci | 122ci | ▲ FW-40+781 ci · +640% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 3.3in | ▲ FW-40+2.2 in · +67% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 3.6in | ▲ FW-40+1.2 in · +33% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Spicer 1010 | Synchronized Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 267in | 131in | ▲ FW-40+136 in · +104% |
| Width | Not recorded | 61in | — |
| Height | 134in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 30,630lb | 3,814lb | ▲ FW-40+26,816 lb · +703% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Hydraulic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,970lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Hydraulic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.9gal | 2.4gal | ▲ FW-40+14.5 gal · +604% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Kioti DK50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Foldable ROPS or Cab (optional) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (295 hp)B · 44th percentile (49 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (903 ci)B · 29th percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (30,630 lb)B · 34th percentile (3,814 lb)
A · FW-40B · DK50Median Utility Tractor