Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford FW-40 vs Steyr 1100
FordFord FW-40
vs
SteyrSteyr 1100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FW-40 higher · +195 hp (+195%)FW-40295 hp
1100100 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FW-40 is in the 96th percentile; 1100 is in the 84th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-40 higher · +538 ci (+147%)FW-40903 ci
1100365 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FW-40 is in the 98th percentile; 1100 is in the 87th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-40 higher · +2 (+33%)FW-408
11006
Median Utility Tractor4
FW-40 is in the 99th percentile; 1100 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ FW-40 higher · +8 (+67%)FW-4020
110012
Median Utility Tractor12
FW-40 is in the 86th percentile; 1100 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
FW-40 (A)1100 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steyr | — |
| Model | FW-40 | 1100 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Steyr | — |
| Model | Not recorded | WD 610.40 | — |
| Power Output | 295hp | 100hp | ▲ FW-40+195 hp · +195% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ FW-40+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 8 | 6 | ▲ FW-40+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 903ci | 365ci | ▲ FW-40+538 ci · +147% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.1in | ▲ FW-40+1.4 in · +34% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 4.5in | ▲ FW-40+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Spicer 1010 | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 267in | 170in | ▲ FW-40+97 in · +57% |
| Height | 134in | 98in | ▲ FW-40+36 in · +37% |
| Operating Weight | 30,630lb | 9,437lb | ▲ FW-40+21,193 lb · +225% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (295 hp)B · 84th percentile (100 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (903 ci)B · 87th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (30,630 lb)B · 84th percentile (9,437 lb)
A · FW-40B · 1100Median Utility Tractor