Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford FW-40 vs Yanmar YM270
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM270
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 55.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
FordFord FW-40
vs
YanmarYanmar YM270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FW-40 higher · +275 hp (+1375%)FW-40295 hp
YM27020 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FW-40 is in the 96th percentile; YM270 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-40 higher · +848 ci (+1530%)FW-40903 ci
YM27055.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FW-40 is in the 98th percentile; YM270 is in the 4th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-40 higher · +6 (+300%)FW-408
YM2702
Median Utility Tractor4
FW-40 is in the 99th percentile; YM270 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ FW-40 higher · +14 (+233%)FW-4020
YM2706
Median Utility Tractor12
FW-40 is in the 86th percentile; YM270 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
FW-40 (A)YM270 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | FW-40 | YM270 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 2W85 | — |
| Power Output | 295hp | 20hp | ▲ FW-40+275 hp · +1375% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 8 | 2 | ▲ FW-40+6 · +300% |
| Displacement | 903ci | 55.4ci | ▲ FW-40+848 ci · +1530% |
| Bore | 5.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Spicer 1010 | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 267in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 134in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 30,630lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford FW-40 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (295 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (903 ci)B · 4th percentile (55.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 11th percentile (6)
A · FW-40B · YM270Median Utility Tractor