Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford FW-60 vs Kirovets K-701M
KirovetsModel B
Kirovets K-701M
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 1,052 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord FW-60
vs
KirovetsKirovets K-701M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedFW-60335 hp
K-701M335 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FW-60 is in the 97th percentile; K-701M is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ K-701M higher · +149 ci (+17%)FW-60903 ci
K-701M1,052 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FW-60 is in the 98th percentile; K-701M is in the 99th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFW-608
K-701M8
Median Utility Tractor4
FW-60 is in the 99th percentile; K-701M is in the 99th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ FW-60 higher · +4 (+25%)FW-6020
K-701M16
Median Utility Tractor12
FW-60 is in the 86th percentile; K-701M is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
FW-60 (A)K-701M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kirovets | — |
| Model | FW-60 | K-701M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | YaMZ | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 8423 | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 335hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ FW-60+700 RPM · +37% |
| Cylinders | 8 | 8 | Same |
| Displacement | 903ci | 1,052ci | ▲ K-701M+149 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 5.5in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 5.5in | ▲ K-701M+0.7 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual with hydraulic cerametallic dry discs clutch | Four-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 267in | 295in | ▲ K-701M+28 in · +10% |
| Width | Not recorded | 112in | — |
| Height | 134in | 159in | ▲ K-701M+25 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 31,100lb | 32,200lb | ▲ K-701M+1,100 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated power | Articulated power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 12,502lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Articulated power | Articulated power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic dry disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford FW-60 | Kirovets K-701M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab with air-conditioning | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 97th percentile (335 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (903 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,052 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 99th percentile (8)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (31,100 lb)B · 98th percentile (32,200 lb)
A · FW-60B · K-701MMedian Utility Tractor