Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Ford TW-35 vs McCormick Intl XTX200

McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl XTX200
Row Crop
- power
- 196 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
FordFord TW-35
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl XTX200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ XTX200 higher · +9 hp (+5%)TW-35187 hp
XTX200196 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
TW-35 is in the 72nd percentile; XTX200 is in the 75th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ XTX200 higher · +10 ci (+2%)TW-35401 ci
XTX200411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
TW-35 is in the 51st percentile; XTX200 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTW-356
XTX2006
Median Row Crop Tractor6
TW-35 is in the 50th percentile; XTX200 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ XTX200 higher · +16 (+100%)TW-3516
XTX20032
Median Row Crop Tractor16
TW-35 is in the 50th percentile; XTX200 is in the 91st · 1,200 models
TW-35 (A)XTX200 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | TW-35 | XTX200 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Iveco | — |
| Power Output | 187hp | 196hp | ▲ XTX200+9 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 411ci | ▲ XTX200+10 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ TW-35+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 5.2in | ▲ XTX200+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial Power Shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 179in | 209in | ▲ XTX200+30 in · +17% |
| Width | 83.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 119in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,100lb | 15,880lb | ▲ XTX200+780 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | PFC (Pressure Flow Compensated) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4-38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab standard with air-conditioning or ROPS available | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 72nd percentile (187 hp)B · 75th percentile (196 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 51st percentile (401 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 91st percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 67th percentile (15,100 lb)B · 69th percentile (15,880 lb)
A · TW-35B · XTX200Median Row Crop Tractor