Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Ford TW-35 vs New Holland T7030
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7030
Row Crop
- power
- 186 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
FordFord TW-35
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ TW-35 higher · +1 hp (<1%)TW-35187 hp
T7030186 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
TW-35 is in the 72nd percentile; T7030 is in the 72nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T7030 higher · +10 ci (+2%)TW-35401 ci
T7030411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
TW-35 is in the 51st percentile; T7030 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTW-356
T70306
Median Row Crop Tractor6
TW-35 is in the 50th percentile; T7030 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ T7030 higher · +3 (+19%)TW-3516
T703019
Median Row Crop Tractor16
TW-35 is in the 50th percentile; T7030 is in the 68th · 1,200 models
TW-35 (A)T7030 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | TW-35 | T7030 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | CNH (Case New Holland) Osterreich GmbH | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF | — |
| Power Output | 187hp | 186hp | ▲ TW-35+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 411ci | ▲ T7030+10 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ TW-35+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 5.2in | ▲ T7030+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial Power Shift | 19-speed full range operator-controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 179in | 190in | ▲ T7030+11 in · +6% |
| Width | 83.6in | 91.9in | ▲ T7030+8.3 in · +10% |
| Height | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,100lb | 17,890lb | ▲ T7030+2,790 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4-38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford TW-35 | New Holland T7030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab standard with air-conditioning or ROPS available | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 72nd percentile (187 hp)B · 72nd percentile (186 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 51st percentile (401 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 68th percentile (19)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 67th percentile (15,100 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,890 lb)
A · TW-35B · T7030Median Row Crop Tractor