Image not recorded
HesstonModel A
Hesston 780
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 224 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Hesston 780 vs Ursus C-350
HesstonHesston 780
vs
UrsusUrsus C-350
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 780 higher · +34 ci (+18%)780224 ci
C-350190 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
780 is in the 61st percentile; C-350 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied7804
C-3504
Median Utility Tractor4
780 is in the 50th percentile; C-350 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 780 higher · +666 lb (+14%)7805,495 lb
C-3504,829 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
780 is in the 51st percentile; C-350 is in the 46th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ 780 higher · +7 in (+5%)780135 in
C-350128 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
780 is in the 48th percentile; C-350 is in the 38th · 4,659 models
780 (A)C-350 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Hesston | Ursus | — |
| Model | 780 | C-350 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Ursus | — |
| Model | 8045 | S-4001 | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 50hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 780+500 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 224ci | 190ci | ▲ 780+34 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.7in | ▲ 780+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized, mechanical shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 135in | 128in | ▲ 780+7 in · +5% |
| Height | 59.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,495lb | 4,829lb | ▲ 780+666 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Hesston 780 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 61st percentile (224 ci)B · 51st percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,495 lb)B · 46th percentile (4,829 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 48th percentile (135 in)B · 38th percentile (128 in)
A · 780B · C-350Median Utility Tractor