Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
IMT 2050 vs IMT 240
Image not recorded
IMTModel B
IMT 240
Utility
- power
- 47 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
IMTIMT 2050
vs
IMTIMT 240
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2050 higher · +7 hp (+15%)205054 hp
24047 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2050 is in the 49th percentile; 240 is in the 41st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2050 higher · +26 ci (+17%)2050179 ci
240153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2050 is in the 49th percentile; 240 is in the 39th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied20503
2403
Median Utility Tractor4
2050 is in the 23rd percentile; 240 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2050 higher · +1,410 lb (+37%)20505,182 lb
2403,772 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
2050 is in the 49th percentile; 240 is in the 33rd · 5,107 models
2050 (A)240 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | IMT 2050 | IMT 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | IMT | Same |
| Model | 2050 | 240 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | IMT 2050 | IMT 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 3029DF186 | AD3-152 | — |
| Power Output | 54hp | 47hp | ▲ 2050+7 hp · +15% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 2050+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 179ci | 153ci | ▲ 2050+26 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | IMT 2050 | IMT 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro | Sliding Spur | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | IMT 2050 | IMT 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 127in | 126in | ▲ 2050+1 in · <1% |
| Width | Not recorded | 72in | — |
| Height | 90.9in | 84in | ▲ 2050+6.9 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 5,182lb | 3,772lb | ▲ 2050+1,410 lb · +37% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | IMT 2050 | IMT 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | IMT 2050 | IMT 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,120lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | IMT 2050 | IMT 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | IMT 2050 | IMT 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.7gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 49th percentile (54 hp)B · 41st percentile (47 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (179 ci)B · 39th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 49th percentile (5,182 lb)B · 33rd percentile (3,772 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 37th percentile (127 in)B · 36th percentile (126 in)
A · 2050B · 240Median Utility Tractor