Head to head · Utility
IMT 2065 vs IMT 285
Image not recorded
IMTIMT 2065
vs
IMTIMT 285
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 285 higher · +12.6 hp (+20%)206562.4 hp
28575 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2065 is in the 56th percentile; 285 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 285 higher · +95 ci (+62%)2065153 ci
285248 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2065 is in the 39th percentile; 285 is in the 70th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 285 higher · +1 (+33%)20653
2854
Median Utility Tractor4
2065 is in the 23rd percentile; 285 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2065 higher · +2 (+25%)206510
2858
Median Utility Tractor12
2065 is in the 39th percentile; 285 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
2065 (A)285 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | IMT | Same |
| Model | 2065 | 285 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | Not recorded | — |
| Model | DM34/T | A4-248 | — |
| Power Output | 62.4hp | 75hp | ▲ 285+12.6 hp · +20% |
| Rated RPM | 2,250RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 2065+250 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 285+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 153ci | 248ci | ▲ 285+95 ci · +62% |
| Bore | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Sliding spur | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 65.6in | 81.6in | ▲ 285+16 in · +24% |
| Height | 90.9in | 99.6in | ▲ 285+8.7 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 6,129lb | 6,199lb | ▲ 285+70 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 63.4hp | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3-point | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 4,910lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | IMT 2065 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 56th percentile (62.4 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 39th percentile (153 ci)B · 70th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,129 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,199 lb)
A · 2065B · 285Median Utility Tractor