Head to head · Utility
IMT 2090 vs IMT 285
Image not recorded
IMTIMT 2090
vs
IMTIMT 285
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2090 higher · +16 hp (+21%)209091 hp
28575 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2090 is in the 79th percentile; 285 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2090 higher · +28 ci (+11%)2090276 ci
285248 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2090 is in the 82nd percentile; 285 is in the 70th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied20904
2854
Median Utility Tractor4
2090 is in the 50th percentile; 285 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2090 higher · +2 (+25%)209010
2858
Median Utility Tractor12
2090 is in the 39th percentile; 285 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
2090 (A)285 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | IMT | Same |
| Model | 2090 | 285 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 4045TF270 | A4-248 | — |
| Power Output | 91hp | 75hp | ▲ 2090+16 hp · +21% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 2090+300 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 276ci | 248ci | ▲ 2090+28 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro | Sliding spur | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 140in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.6in | — |
| Height | 106in | 99.6in | ▲ 2090+6.4 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 9,261lb | 6,199lb | ▲ 2090+3,062 lb · +49% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 63.4hp | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3-point | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 4,910lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | IMT 2090 | IMT 285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 79th percentile (91 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 82nd percentile (276 ci)B · 70th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 83rd percentile (9,261 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,199 lb)
A · 2090B · 285Median Utility Tractor