Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
IMT 285 vs IMT 569
Image not recorded
IMTIMT 285
vs
IMTIMT 569
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 285 higher · +12 hp (+19%)28575 hp
56963 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
285 is in the 68th percentile; 569 is in the 57th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 285 higher · +45 ci (+22%)285248 ci
569203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
285 is in the 70th percentile; 569 is in the 56th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2854
5694
Median Utility Tractor4
285 is in the 50th percentile; 569 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 569 higher · +2 (+25%)2858
56910
Median Utility Tractor12
285 is in the 23rd percentile; 569 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
285 (A)569 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | IMT | Same |
| Model | 285 | 569 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | IMT | — |
| Model | A4-248 | DM34/T IMR | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 63hp | ▲ 285+12 hp · +19% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 569+250 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 248ci | 203ci | ▲ 285+45 ci · +22% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding spur | Partly synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 154in | — |
| Width | 81.6in | 75.6in | ▲ 285+6 in · +8% |
| Height | 99.6in | 104in | ▲ 569+4.4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 6,199lb | 8,048lb | ▲ 569+1,849 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | 63.4hp | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.5-24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3-point | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,910lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Capacities
| Spec | IMT 285 | IMT 569 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 68th percentile (75 hp)B · 57th percentile (63 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 70th percentile (248 ci)B · 56th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 59th percentile (6,199 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,048 lb)
A · 285B · 569Median Utility Tractor