Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
IMT 285 vs New Holland TN75FA
New HollandModel B
New Holland TN75FA
Utility
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 238 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
IMTIMT 285
vs
New HollandNew Holland TN75FA
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 285 higher · +3 hp (+4%)28575 hp
TN75FA72 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
285 is in the 68th percentile; TN75FA is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 285 higher · +10 ci (+4%)285248 ci
TN75FA238 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
285 is in the 70th percentile; TN75FA is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2854
TN75FA4
Median Utility Tractor4
285 is in the 50th percentile; TN75FA is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TN75FA higher · +8 (+100%)2858
TN75FA16
Median Utility Tractor12
285 is in the 23rd percentile; TN75FA is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
285 (A)TN75FA (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | New Holland | — |
| Model | 285 | TN75FA | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | A4-248 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 72hp | ▲ 285+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TN75FA+300 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 248ci | 238ci | ▲ 285+10 ci · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding spur | Synchro Command Plus | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 81.6in | 60in | ▲ 285+21.6 in · +36% |
| Height | 99.6in | 93.6in | ▲ 285+6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 6,199lb | 5,780lb | ▲ 285+419 lb · +7% |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | 63.4hp | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 380/70R24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3-point | Cat II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,910lb | 4,334lb | ▲ 285+576 lb · +13% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Capacities
| Spec | IMT 285 | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 68th percentile (75 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 70th percentile (248 ci)B · 65th percentile (238 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 59th percentile (6,199 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,780 lb)
A · 285B · TN75FAMedian Utility Tractor