Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
IMT 558 vs Massey Ferguson 410
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 410
Utility
- power
- 55 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
IMTIMT 558
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 410
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 558 higher · +3 hp (+5%)55858 hp
41055 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
558 is in the 52nd percentile; 410 is in the 50th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 558 higher · +2 ci (<1%)558203 ci
410201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
558 is in the 56th percentile; 410 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 558 higher · +1 (+33%)5584
4103
Median Utility Tractor4
558 is in the 50th percentile; 410 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 410 higher · +2 (+33%)5586
4108
Median Utility Tractor12
558 is in the 11th percentile; 410 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
558 (A)410 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | IMT 558 | Massey Ferguson 410 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 558 | 410 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | IMT 558 | Massey Ferguson 410 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | Perkins | — |
| Model | M34/T | 1103C 33 | — |
| Power Output | 58hp | 55hp | ▲ 558+3 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,250RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 558+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 558+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 203ci | 201ci | ▲ 558+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 4.1in | ▲ 410+0.5 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | IMT 558 | Massey Ferguson 410 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | IMT 558 | Massey Ferguson 410 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 138in | ▲ 558+8 in · +6% |
| Width | 71.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 93.7in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,071lb | 5,016lb | ▲ 558+55 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | IMT 558 | Massey Ferguson 410 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | IMT 558 | Massey Ferguson 410 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | IMT 558 | Massey Ferguson 410 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | IMT 558 | Massey Ferguson 410 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (58 hp)B · 50th percentile (55 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 56th percentile (203 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 48th percentile (5,071 lb)B · 48th percentile (5,016 lb)
A · 558B · 410Median Utility Tractor