International HarvesterModel A
International Harvester 100
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
International Harvester 100 vs Massey-Harris 22
Image not recorded
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris 22
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 140 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
International HarvesterInternational Harvester 100
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 22
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 22 higher · +17 ci (+14%)100123 ci
22140 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
100 is in the 30th percentile; 22 is in the 36th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1004
224
Median Utility Tractor4
100 is in the 50th percentile; 22 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied1004
224
Median Utility Tractor12
100 is in the 4th percentile; 22 is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 22 higher · +328 lb (+13%)1002,600 lb
222,928 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
100 is in the 18th percentile; 22 is in the 22nd · 5,107 models
100 (A)22 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | International Harvester 100 | Massey-Harris 22 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | 100 | 22 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | International Harvester 100 | Massey-Harris 22 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Continental | — |
| Model | C-123 | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 22+100 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 123ci | 140ci | ▲ 22+17 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.2in | ▲ 22+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4.4in | ▲ 22+0.4 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | International Harvester 100 | Massey-Harris 22 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | International Harvester 100 | Massey-Harris 22 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 2,600lb | 2,928lb | ▲ 22+328 lb · +13% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | International Harvester 100 | Massey-Harris 22 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | International Harvester 100 | Massey-Harris 22 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 6V | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | International Harvester 100 | Massey-Harris 22 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | 2.8gal | ▲ 22+1.5 gal · +115% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 30th percentile (123 ci)B · 36th percentile (140 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,600 lb)B · 22nd percentile (2,928 lb)
A · 100B · 22Median Utility Tractor