International HarvesterModel A
International Harvester Farmall
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 221 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Head to head · Row Crop
International Harvester Farmall vs Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 206 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
International HarvesterInternational Harvester Farmall
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall higher · +15 ci (+7%)Farmall221 ci
Jet Star 3206 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Farmall is in the 11th percentile; Jet Star 3 is in the 9th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall4
Jet Star 34
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Farmall is in the 17th percentile; Jet Star 3 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall higher · +370 lb (+10%)Farmall4,000 lb
Jet Star 33,630 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Farmall is in the 5th percentile; Jet Star 3 is in the 4th · 1,350 models
Length
▲ Farmall higher · +10 in (+8%)Farmall136 in
Jet Star 3126 in
Median Row Crop Tractor180 in
Farmall is in the 10th percentile; Jet Star 3 is in the 5th · 1,157 models
Farmall (A)Jet Star 3 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | International Harvester Farmall | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | Farmall | Jet Star 3 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | International Harvester Farmall | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,200RPM | 1,750RPM | ▲ Jet Star 3+550 RPM · +46% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 221ci | 206ci | ▲ Farmall+15 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 3.8in | 3.6in | ▲ Farmall+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | International Harvester Farmall | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 136in | 126in | ▲ Farmall+10 in · +8% |
| Width | 86in | 70.3in | ▲ Farmall+15.7 in · +22% |
| Height | 67in | 78.3in | ▲ Jet Star 3+11.3 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | 4,000lb | 3,630lb | ▲ Farmall+370 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | International Harvester Farmall | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | International Harvester Farmall | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | International Harvester Farmall | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | International Harvester Farmall | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Hand Crank | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | International Harvester Farmall | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9gal | 3gal | ▲ Farmall+6 gal · +200% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 11th percentile (221 ci)B · 9th percentile (206 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 5th percentile (4,000 lb)B · 4th percentile (3,630 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 10th percentile (136 in)B · 5th percentile (126 in)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 38th percentile (86 in)B · 7th percentile (70.3 in)
A · FarmallB · Jet Star 3Median Row Crop Tractor