
IsekiModel A
Iseki AT500
Utility
- power
- 49.4 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility

Utility
Utility
How they compare
AT500 is in the 44th percentile; 480 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
AT500 is in the 49th percentile; 480 is in the 46th · 5,580 models
AT500 is in the 50th percentile; 480 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
AT500 is in the 92nd percentile; 480 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Long/UTB | — |
| Model | AT500 | 480 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | UTB | — |
| Model | E4DE | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 49.4hp | 48hp | ▲ AT500+1.4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ AT500+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ AT500+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 180ci | 172ci | ▲ AT500+8 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 3.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 140in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 62.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Iseki AT500 | Long/UTB 480 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.5gal | — |
Category context