Image not recorded
IsekiModel A
Iseki T9000
Utility
- power
- 88.8 hp
- displacement
- 329 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Iseki T9000 vs Kubota M90
Image not recorded
IsekiIseki T9000
vs
KubotaKubota M90
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedT900088.8 hp
M9088.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T9000 is in the 76th percentile; M90 is in the 76th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T9000 higher · +44 ci (+15%)T9000329 ci
M90285 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T9000 is in the 85th percentile; M90 is in the 83rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ T9000 higher · +2 (+50%)T90006
M904
Median Utility Tractor4
T9000 is in the 93rd percentile; M90 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M90 higher · +8 (+50%)T900016
M9024
Median Utility Tractor12
T9000 is in the 73rd percentile; M90 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
T9000 (A)M90 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Kubota | — |
| Model | T9000 | M90 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Isuzu | Kubota | — |
| Model | 6BB1 | V4702 | — |
| Power Output | 88.8hp | 88.8hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ M90+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ T9000+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 329ci | 285ci | ▲ T9000+44 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.3in | ▲ M90+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.9in | ▲ M90+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchromesh, Power shift, Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 157in | 153in | ▲ T9000+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 76.4in | 74in | ▲ T9000+2.4 in · +3% |
| Height | 102in | 103in | ▲ M90+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 7,253lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Iseki T9000 | Kubota M90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 76th percentile (88.8 hp)B · 76th percentile (88.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 85th percentile (329 ci)B · 83rd percentile (285 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Length
median 137 inA · 73rd percentile (157 in)B · 69th percentile (153 in)
A · T9000B · M90Median Utility Tractor