IsekiModel A
Iseki TU160
Utility
- power
- 15.8 hp
- displacement
- 59.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Iseki TU160 vs Yanmar AF-170
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar AF-170
Utility
- power
- 16.8 hp
- displacement
- 61.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
IsekiIseki TU160
vs
YanmarYanmar AF-170
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ AF-170 higher · +1 hp (+6%)TU16015.8 hp
AF-17016.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TU160 is in the 3rd percentile; AF-170 is in the 4th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ AF-170 higher · +1.7 ci (+3%)TU16059.7 ci
AF-17061.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TU160 is in the 5th percentile; AF-170 is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTU1603
AF-1703
Median Utility Tractor4
TU160 is in the 23rd percentile; AF-170 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ AF-170 higher · +2 (+33%)TU1606
AF-1708
Median Utility Tractor12
TU160 is in the 11th percentile; AF-170 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
TU160 (A)AF-170 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Iseki TU160 | Yanmar AF-170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | TU160 | AF-170 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Iseki TU160 | Yanmar AF-170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | K3D | 3TNE74 | — |
| Power Output | 15.8hp | 16.8hp | ▲ AF-170+1 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 59.7ci | 61.4ci | ▲ AF-170+1.7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 2.9in | 2.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.1in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Iseki TU160 | Yanmar AF-170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Iseki TU160 | Yanmar AF-170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 96.1in | 103in | ▲ AF-170+6.9 in · +7% |
| Width | 42.9in | 42.1in | ▲ TU160+0.8 in · +2% |
| Height | 67.3in | 74.4in | ▲ AF-170+7.1 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 1,510lb | 1,631lb | ▲ AF-170+121 lb · +8% |
Tires
| Spec | Iseki TU160 | Yanmar AF-170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12-Jun | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 8.3-20 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Iseki TU160 | Yanmar AF-170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Iseki TU160 | Yanmar AF-170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Iseki TU160 | Yanmar AF-170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 3rd percentile (15.8 hp)B · 4th percentile (16.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (59.7 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 6th percentile (1,510 lb)B · 8th percentile (1,631 lb)
A · TU160B · AF-170Median Utility Tractor