Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Iseki TU320 vs Mitsubishi GS202
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GS202
Utility
- power
- 19.7 hp
- displacement
- 68.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 30
IsekiIseki TU320
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GS202
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TU320 higher · +0.3 hp (+2%)TU32020 hp
GS20219.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TU320 is in the 8th percentile; GS202 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TU320 higher · +2.7 ci (+4%)TU32071.4 ci
GS20268.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TU320 is in the 10th percentile; GS202 is in the 9th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTU3203
GS2023
Median Utility Tractor4
TU320 is in the 23rd percentile; GS202 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GS202 higher · +24 (+400%)TU3206
GS20230
Median Utility Tractor12
TU320 is in the 11th percentile; GS202 is in the 96th · 4,941 models
TU320 (A)GS202 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Iseki TU320 | Mitsubishi GS202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | TU320 | GS202 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Iseki TU320 | Mitsubishi GS202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | E3AF1 | S3L | — |
| Power Output | 20hp | 19.7hp | ▲ TU320+0.3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 71.4ci | 68.7ci | ▲ TU320+2.7 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ GS202+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.4in | 3.1in | ▲ TU320+0.3 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Iseki TU320 | Mitsubishi GS202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Iseki TU320 | Mitsubishi GS202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 104in | ▲ TU320+15 in · +14% |
| Width | 51.4in | 43.1in | ▲ TU320+8.3 in · +19% |
| Height | Not recorded | 74.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,006lb | 1,962lb | ▲ TU320+44 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Iseki TU320 | Mitsubishi GS202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Iseki TU320 | Mitsubishi GS202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | JIS0 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Iseki TU320 | Mitsubishi GS202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Iseki TU320 | Mitsubishi GS202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (20 hp)B · 8th percentile (19.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (71.4 ci)B · 9th percentile (68.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 96th percentile (30)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 12th percentile (2,006 lb)B · 11th percentile (1,962 lb)
A · TU320B · GS202Median Utility Tractor