ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT425
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT425 vs JCB Fastrac 2140
Image not recorded
JCBModel B
JCB Fastrac 2140
Utility
- power
- 142 hp
- displacement
- 359 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 54
ChallengerChallenger MT425
vs
JCBJCB Fastrac 2140
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ Fastrac 2140 higher · +116 ci (+48%)MT425243 ci
Fastrac 2140359 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT425 is in the 67th percentile; Fastrac 2140 is in the 87th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Fastrac 2140 higher · +2 (+50%)MT4254
Fastrac 21406
Median Utility Tractor4
MT425 is in the 50th percentile; Fastrac 2140 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Fastrac 2140 higher · +30 (+125%)MT42524
Fastrac 214054
Median Utility Tractor12
MT425 is in the 92nd percentile; Fastrac 2140 is in the 99th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ Fastrac 2140 higher · +8,057 lb (+130%)MT4256,182 lb
Fastrac 214014,239 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT425 is in the 58th percentile; Fastrac 2140 is in the 92nd · 5,107 models
MT425 (A)Fastrac 2140 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | JCB | — |
| Model | MT425 | Fastrac 2140 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Cummins | — |
| Model | 3054 | QSB30 | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 142hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ Fastrac 2140+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 243ci | 359ci | ▲ Fastrac 2140+116 ci · +48% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4in | ▲ Fastrac 2140+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ MT425+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 24-speed power shuttle | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 202in | — |
| Width | 77in | 90.9in | ▲ Fastrac 2140+13.9 in · +18% |
| Height | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,182lb | 14,239lb | ▲ Fastrac 2140+8,057 lb · +130% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | 12V | Same |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | JCB Fastrac 2140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 67th percentile (243 ci)B · 87th percentile (359 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 99th percentile (54)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,182 lb)B · 92nd percentile (14,239 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 75th percentile (77 in)B · 92nd percentile (90.9 in)
A · MT425B · Fastrac 2140Median Utility Tractor