Image not recorded
John DeereModel A
John Deere 410B
Specialized
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 219 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Specialized
John Deere 410B vs Kubota M62
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M62
Specialized
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
John DeereJohn Deere 410B
vs
KubotaKubota M62
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Specialized
Engine Power
= Effectively tied410B62 hp
M6262 hp
Median Specialized Tractor62 hp
410B is in the 50th percentile; M62 is in the 50th · 55 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 410B higher · +70 ci (+47%)410B219 ci
M62149 ci
Median Specialized Tractor239 ci
410B is in the 43rd percentile; M62 is in the 32nd · 56 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied410B4
M624
Median Specialized Tractor4
410B is in the 50th percentile; M62 is in the 50th · 58 models
Operating Weight
▲ 410B higher · +9,405 lb (+188%)410B14,396 lb
M624,991 lb
Median Specialized Tractor12,600 lb
410B is in the 71st percentile; M62 is in the 29th · 50 models
410B (A)M62 (B)Median Specialized Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Kubota | — |
| Model | 410B | M62 | — |
| Category | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | Same |
Engine
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Kubota | — |
| Model | 4219D | V2403 | — |
| Power Output | 62hp | 62hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ M62+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 219ci | 149ci | ▲ 410B+70 ci · +47% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.4in | ▲ 410B+0.6 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4in | ▲ 410B+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 276in | 124in | ▲ 410B+152 in · +123% |
| Width | 80.3in | 75in | ▲ 410B+5.3 in · +7% |
| Height | Not recorded | 102in | — |
| Operating Weight | 14,396lb | 4,991lb | ▲ 410B+9,405 lb · +188% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydraulic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,796lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydraulic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Multiple wet disks | — |
Electrical
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.3gal | 2.2gal | ▲ 410B+2.1 gal · +95% |
Operator Station
| Spec | John Deere 410B | Kubota M62 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS canopy | Four-post ROPS/FOPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 62 hpA · 50th percentile (62 hp)B · 50th percentile (62 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 239 ciA · 43rd percentile (219 ci)B · 32nd percentile (149 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,600 lbA · 71st percentile (14,396 lb)B · 29th percentile (4,991 lb)
Length
median 274 inA · 59th percentile (276 in)B · 22nd percentile (124 in)
A · 410BB · M62Median Specialized Tractor