Image not recorded
John DeereModel A
John Deere 5065M
Utility
- power
- 65 hp
- displacement
- 186 ci
- Cylinders
- 5
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
John Deere 5065M vs LS XJ25
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS XJ25
Utility
- power
- 24.4 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
John DeereJohn Deere 5065M
vs
LSLS XJ25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5065M higher · +40.6 hp (+166%)5065M65 hp
XJ2524.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5065M is in the 59th percentile; XJ25 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5065M higher · +106 ci (+131%)5065M186 ci
XJ2580.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5065M is in the 50th percentile; XJ25 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 5065M higher · +2 (+67%)5065M5
XJ253
Median Utility Tractor4
5065M is in the 88th percentile; XJ25 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 5065M higher · +4,187 lb (+229%)5065M6,017 lb
XJ251,830 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
5065M is in the 57th percentile; XJ25 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
5065M (A)XJ25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | LS | — |
| Model | 5065M | XJ25 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | PowerTech 5030 | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 65hp | 24.4hp | ▲ 5065M+40.6 hp · +166% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ XJ25+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 5 | 3 | ▲ 5065M+2 · +67% |
| Displacement | 186ci | 80.4ci | ▲ 5065M+106 ci · +131% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.1in | ▲ 5065M+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 3.6in | ▲ 5065M+0.5 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 103in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 44.9in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 85in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,017lb | 1,830lb | ▲ 5065M+4,187 lb · +229% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,595lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | John Deere 5065M | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, Two-post foldable ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 59th percentile (65 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (186 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 88th percentile (5)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 57th percentile (6,017 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,830 lb)
A · 5065MB · XJ25Median Utility Tractor