John DeereModel A
John Deere 5720
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
John Deere 5720 vs Schluter Compact 850
Image not recorded
SchluterModel B
Schluter Compact 850
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
John DeereJohn Deere 5720
vs
SchluterSchluter Compact 850
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied572080 hp
Compact 85080 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5720 is in the 71st percentile; Compact 850 is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Compact 850 higher · +14 ci (+5%)5720276 ci
Compact 850290 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5720 is in the 81st percentile; Compact 850 is in the 84th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied57204
Compact 8504
Median Utility Tractor4
5720 is in the 50th percentile; Compact 850 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 5720 higher · +583 lb (+8%)57208,157 lb
Compact 8507,574 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
5720 is in the 77th percentile; Compact 850 is in the 72nd · 5,107 models
5720 (A)Compact 850 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Schluter | — |
| Model | 5720 | Compact 850 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Schluter | — |
| Model | 4045TL273 | SDM 110 W 4 | — |
| Power Output | 80hp | 80hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 5720+500 RPM · +28% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 276ci | 290ci | ▲ Compact 850+14 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 4.3in | ▲ Compact 850+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.9in | ▲ 5720+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | PowrQuad | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 156in | 156in | Same |
| Width | 85.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 102in | 96.9in | ▲ 5720+5.1 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 8,157lb | 7,574lb | ▲ 5720+583 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing pressure compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Mechanical | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD - Mechanical Front Wheel Drive | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Mechanical | — |
Electrical
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | John Deere 5720 | Schluter Compact 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 71st percentile (80 hp)B · 71st percentile (80 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 81st percentile (276 ci)B · 84th percentile (290 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 77th percentile (8,157 lb)B · 72nd percentile (7,574 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 72nd percentile (156 in)B · 72nd percentile (156 in)
A · 5720B · Compact 850Median Utility Tractor