Head to head · Utility

Kubota M5970 vs Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320

Image not recorded
KubotaModel A

Kubota M5970

Utility

power
59.5 hp
displacement
197 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full M5970 specs
KubotaKubota M5970
vs
SteigerSteiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320 higher · +261 hp (+438%)
M597059.5 hp
Turbo Tiger II ST-320320 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

M5970 is in the 53rd percentile; Turbo Tiger II ST-320 is in the 97th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320 higher · +706 ci (+358%)
M5970197 ci
Turbo Tiger II ST-320903 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

M5970 is in the 52nd percentile; Turbo Tiger II ST-320 is in the 98th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320 higher · +5 (+167%)
M59703
Turbo Tiger II ST-3208
Median Utility Tractor4

M5970 is in the 23rd percentile; Turbo Tiger II ST-320 is in the 99th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ M5970 higher · +6 (+60%)
M597016
Turbo Tiger II ST-32010
Median Utility Tractor12

M5970 is in the 73rd percentile; Turbo Tiger II ST-320 is in the 39th · 4,941 models

M5970 (A)Turbo Tiger II ST-320 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
ManufacturerKubotaSteiger—
ModelM5970Turbo Tiger II ST-320—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
ManufacturerKubotaCummins—
ModelD3200VT-903—
Power Output59.5hp320hp▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+261 hp · +438%
Rated RPM2,400RPM2,600RPM▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+200 RPM · +8%
Cylinders38▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+5 · +167%
Displacement197ci903ci▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+706 ci · +358%
Bore4.3in5.5in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+1.2 in · +28%
Stroke4.5in4.8in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+0.3 in · +7%

Transmission

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
TypeManual with dry disc clutchManual—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Length144in244in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+100 in · +69%
Width72.8in96in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+23.2 in · +32%
Height95.3in133in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+37.7 in · +40%
Operating Weight5,049lb24,000lb▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+18,951 lb · +375%

Hydraulics

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
System TypeNot recordedOpen Center—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Hitch TypeII/I and JISII/INot recorded—
Hitch CategoryCategory 2Not recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 4WD—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Coolant3.1galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecKubota M5970Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
TypeROPSCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 53rd percentile (59.5 hp)B · 97th percentile (320 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 52nd percentile (197 ci)B · 98th percentile (903 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 99th percentile (8)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 48th percentile (5,049 lb)B · 96th percentile (24,000 lb)
A · M5970B · Turbo Tiger II ST-320Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageKubota M5970Full spec pageSteiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320