KubotaModel A
Kubota M7950
Utility
- power
- 81 hp
- displacement
- 262 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Kubota M7950 vs Massey Ferguson 2660 HD
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 2660 HD
Utility
- power
- 81 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
KubotaKubota M7950
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 2660 HD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedM795081 hp
2660 HD81 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
M7950 is in the 72nd percentile; 2660 HD is in the 72nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2660 HD higher · +7 ci (+3%)M7950262 ci
2660 HD269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
M7950 is in the 74th percentile; 2660 HD is in the 78th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedM79504
2660 HD4
Median Utility Tractor4
M7950 is in the 50th percentile; 2660 HD is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ M7950 higher · +1,522 lb (+27%)M79507,100 lb
2660 HD5,578 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
M7950 is in the 68th percentile; 2660 HD is in the 52nd · 5,107 models
M7950 (A)2660 HD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | M7950 | 2660 HD | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | Perkins | — |
| Model | V4300 | 1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 81hp | 81hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ M7950+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 262ci | 269ci | ▲ 2660 HD+7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ M7950+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 2660 HD+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 153in | 155in | ▲ 2660 HD+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 78.2in | 79.1in | ▲ 2660 HD+0.9 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 7,100lb | 5,578lb | ▲ M7950+1,522 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Kubota M7950 | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 72nd percentile (81 hp)B · 72nd percentile (81 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 74th percentile (262 ci)B · 78th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 68th percentile (7,100 lb)B · 52nd percentile (5,578 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 69th percentile (153 in)B · 71st percentile (155 in)
A · M7950B · 2660 HDMedian Utility Tractor