KubotaModel A
Kubota M9000
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 202 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Kubota M9000 vs LS XJ25
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS XJ25
Utility
- power
- 24.4 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
KubotaKubota M9000
vs
LSLS XJ25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M9000 higher · +65.6 hp (+269%)M900090 hp
XJ2524.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
M9000 is in the 78th percentile; XJ25 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ M9000 higher · +122 ci (+151%)M9000202 ci
XJ2580.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
M9000 is in the 55th percentile; XJ25 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ M9000 higher · +1 (+33%)M90004
XJ253
Median Utility Tractor4
M9000 is in the 50th percentile; XJ25 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ M9000 higher · +3,845 lb (+210%)M90005,675 lb
XJ251,830 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
M9000 is in the 53rd percentile; XJ25 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
M9000 (A)XJ25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | LS | — |
| Model | M9000 | XJ25 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | V3300-TIE | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 90hp | 24.4hp | ▲ M9000+65.6 hp · +269% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ M9000+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ M9000+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 202ci | 80.4ci | ▲ M9000+122 ci · +151% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.1in | ▲ M9000+0.8 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.6in | ▲ M9000+0.7 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 103in | — |
| Width | 78in | 44.9in | ▲ M9000+33.1 in · +74% |
| Height | Not recorded | 85in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,675lb | 1,830lb | ▲ M9000+3,845 lb · +210% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with hydraulic wet disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc mechanical | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Kubota M9000 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 78th percentile (90 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (202 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 53rd percentile (5,675 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,830 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 78th percentile (78 in)B · 10th percentile (44.9 in)
A · M9000B · XJ25Median Utility Tractor