Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Kubota MZ75 vs Rhino 1210
KubotaKubota MZ75
vs
RhinoRhino 1210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MZ75 higher · +56 hp (+311%)MZ7574 hp
121018 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MZ75 is in the 66th percentile; 1210 is in the 6th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MZ75 higher · +147 ci (+267%)MZ75202 ci
121055 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MZ75 is in the 55th percentile; 1210 is in the 4th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MZ75 higher · +3 (+300%)MZ754
12101
Median Utility Tractor4
MZ75 is in the 50th percentile; 1210 is in the 1st · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MZ75 higher · +12 (+100%)MZ7524
121012
Median Utility Tractor12
MZ75 is in the 92nd percentile; 1210 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
MZ75 (A)1210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | Rhino | — |
| Model | MZ75 | 1210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | Not recorded | — |
| Model | V3300-T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 74hp | 18hp | ▲ MZ75+56 hp · +311% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ MZ75+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 1 | ▲ MZ75+3 · +300% |
| Displacement | 202ci | 55ci | ▲ MZ75+147 ci · +267% |
| Bore | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 143in | 90in | ▲ MZ75+53 in · +59% |
| Width | 68.1in | 50.5in | ▲ MZ75+17.6 in · +35% |
| Height | 98.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,688lb | 2,360lb | ▲ MZ75+3,328 lb · +141% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | Rhino 1210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 66th percentile (74 hp)B · 6th percentile (18 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (202 ci)B · 4th percentile (55 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 1st percentile (1)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 53rd percentile (5,688 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,360 lb)
A · MZ75B · 1210Median Utility Tractor