Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Kubota MZ75 vs SAME Tiger Six 105
SAMEModel B
SAME Tiger Six 105
Row Crop
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 331 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
KubotaKubota MZ75
vs
SAMESAME Tiger Six 105
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Tiger Six 105 higher · +31 hp (+42%)MZ7574 hp
Tiger Six 105105 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MZ75 is in the 66th percentile; Tiger Six 105 is in the 85th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Tiger Six 105 higher · +129 ci (+64%)MZ75202 ci
Tiger Six 105331 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MZ75 is in the 55th percentile; Tiger Six 105 is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Tiger Six 105 higher · +2 (+50%)MZ754
Tiger Six 1056
Median Utility Tractor4
MZ75 is in the 50th percentile; Tiger Six 105 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MZ75 higher · +12 (+100%)MZ7524
Tiger Six 10512
Median Utility Tractor12
MZ75 is in the 92nd percentile; Tiger Six 105 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
MZ75 (A)Tiger Six 105 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | SAME | — |
| Model | MZ75 | Tiger Six 105 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | SAME | — |
| Model | V3300-T | 986P | — |
| Power Output | 74hp | 105hp | ▲ Tiger Six 105+31 hp · +42% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MZ75+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ Tiger Six 105+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 202ci | 331ci | ▲ Tiger Six 105+129 ci · +64% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.7in | ▲ Tiger Six 105+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Syncromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 143in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 68.1in | 87.4in | ▲ Tiger Six 105+19.3 in · +28% |
| Height | 98.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,688lb | 8,333lb | ▲ Tiger Six 105+2,645 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Kubota MZ75 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 66th percentile (74 hp)B · 85th percentile (105 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (202 ci)B · 85th percentile (331 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 53rd percentile (5,688 lb)B · 78th percentile (8,333 lb)
A · MZ75B · Tiger Six 105Median Utility Tractor