Head to head · Sub-Compact

Lanz Bulldog D2402 vs Mitsubishi MTE2000

Image not recorded
LanzModel A

Lanz Bulldog D2402

Sub-Compact

power
24 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
1
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Bulldog D2402 specs
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B

Mitsubishi MTE2000

Utility

power
24 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MTE2000 specs
LanzLanz Bulldog D2402
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MTE2000

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 802–816

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Bulldog D240224 hp
MTE200024 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

Bulldog D2402 is in the 39th percentile; MTE2000 is in the 39th · 816 models

Cylinders

▲ MTE2000 higher · +2 (+200%)
Bulldog D24021
MTE20003
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3

Bulldog D2402 is in the 2nd percentile; MTE2000 is in the 50th · 802 models

Bulldog D2402 (A)MTE2000 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecLanz Bulldog D2402Mitsubishi MTE2000Difference
ManufacturerLanzMitsubishi—
ModelBulldog D2402MTE2000—
CategorySub-CompactUtility—

Engine

SpecLanz Bulldog D2402Mitsubishi MTE2000Difference
ManufacturerLanzMitsubishi—
Power Output24hp24hpSame
Cylinders13▲ MTE2000+2 · +200%

Transmission

SpecLanz Bulldog D2402Mitsubishi MTE2000Difference
TypeNot recordedGear—

Hitch & Towing

SpecLanz Bulldog D2402Mitsubishi MTE2000Difference
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame

Chassis & Drive

SpecLanz Bulldog D2402Mitsubishi MTE2000Difference
Chassis Type2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type2WDMFWD—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 39th percentile (24 hp)B · 39th percentile (24 hp)

Cylinders

median 3
A · 2nd percentile (1)B · 50th percentile (3)
A · Bulldog D2402B · MTE2000Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageLanz Bulldog D2402Full spec pageMitsubishi MTE2000