Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Leyland 154 vs Leyland 462
LeylandModel B
Leyland 462
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
LeylandLeyland 154
vs
LeylandLeyland 462
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 462 higher · +131 ci (+132%)15499 ci
462230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
154 is in the 22nd percentile; 462 is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1544
4624
Median Utility Tractor4
154 is in the 50th percentile; 462 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied1549
4629
Median Utility Tractor12
154 is in the 35th percentile; 462 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 462 higher · +5,075 lb (+218%)1542,325 lb
4627,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
154 is in the 15th percentile; 462 is in the 71st · 5,107 models
154 (A)462 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Leyland 154 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Leyland | Leyland | Same |
| Model | 154 | 462 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Leyland 154 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | BMC | Leyland | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4/98DT | — |
| Power Output | 28hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 154+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 99ci | 230ci | ▲ 462+131 ci · +132% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.9in | ▲ 462+0.9 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 462+1.4 in · +40% |
Transmission
| Spec | Leyland 154 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Leyland 154 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 102in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 59.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,325lb | 7,400lb | ▲ 462+5,075 lb · +218% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Leyland 154 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Leyland 154 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Leyland 154 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Leyland 154 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 22nd percentile (99 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,325 lb)B · 71st percentile (7,400 lb)
A · 154B · 462Median Utility Tractor