Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Leyland 255 vs Leyland 462
LeylandModel B
Leyland 462
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
LeylandLeyland 255
vs
LeylandLeyland 462
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 462 higher · +8 ci (+4%)255222 ci
462230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
255 is in the 61st percentile; 462 is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2554
4624
Median Utility Tractor4
255 is in the 50th percentile; 462 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 255 higher · +1 (+11%)25510
4629
Median Utility Tractor12
255 is in the 39th percentile; 462 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 462 higher · +1,100 lb (+17%)2556,300 lb
4627,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
255 is in the 60th percentile; 462 is in the 71st · 5,107 models
255 (A)462 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Leyland | Leyland | Same |
| Model | 255 | 462 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Leyland | Leyland | Same |
| Model | 4/98 DT | 4/98DT | — |
| Power Output | 60hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 222ci | 230ci | ▲ 462+8 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 4.9in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 132in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 63.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 92.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,300lb | 7,400lb | ▲ 462+1,100 lb · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Leyland 462 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 61st percentile (222 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,300 lb)B · 71st percentile (7,400 lb)
A · 255B · 462Median Utility Tractor