Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Leyland 255 vs Massey Ferguson 1660
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1660
Utility
- power
- 60 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
LeylandLeyland 255
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1660
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25560 hp
166060 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
255 is in the 54th percentile; 1660 is in the 54th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 255 higher · +42 ci (+23%)255222 ci
1660180 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
255 is in the 61st percentile; 1660 is in the 49th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2554
16604
Median Utility Tractor4
255 is in the 50th percentile; 1660 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1660 higher · +2 (+20%)25510
166012
Median Utility Tractor12
255 is in the 39th percentile; 1660 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
255 (A)1660 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Leyland | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 255 | 1660 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Leyland | Iseki | — |
| Model | 4/98 DT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 60hp | 60hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 1660+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 222ci | 180ci | ▲ 255+42 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | PowerShuttle, DynaQPS | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 132in | 135in | ▲ 1660+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 63.8in | 70.9in | ▲ 1660+7.1 in · +11% |
| Height | 92.9in | 104in | ▲ 1660+11.1 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 6,300lb | 4,079lb | ▲ 255+2,221 lb · +54% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II/I | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 8,378lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.4gal | 2gal | ▲ 255+0.4 gal · +20% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Leyland 255 | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 54th percentile (60 hp)B · 54th percentile (60 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 61st percentile (222 ci)B · 49th percentile (180 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,300 lb)B · 38th percentile (4,079 lb)
A · 255B · 1660Median Utility Tractor