Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Leyland 270 vs LS XJ25
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS XJ25
Utility
- power
- 24.4 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
LeylandLeyland 270
vs
LSLS XJ25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 270 higher · +50.6 hp (+207%)27075 hp
XJ2524.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
270 is in the 68th percentile; XJ25 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 270 higher · +150 ci (+186%)270230 ci
XJ2580.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
270 is in the 62nd percentile; XJ25 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 270 higher · +1 (+33%)2704
XJ253
Median Utility Tractor4
270 is in the 50th percentile; XJ25 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 270 higher · +3,913 lb (+214%)2705,743 lb
XJ251,830 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
270 is in the 54th percentile; XJ25 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
270 (A)XJ25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Leyland | LS | — |
| Model | 270 | XJ25 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Leyland | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 4/98 NT | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 24.4hp | ▲ 270+50.6 hp · +207% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 270+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 230ci | 80.4ci | ▲ 270+150 ci · +186% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.1in | ▲ 270+0.8 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 270+1.3 in · +36% |
Transmission
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 134in | 103in | ▲ 270+31 in · +30% |
| Width | 68.5in | 44.9in | ▲ 270+23.6 in · +53% |
| Height | 95.6in | 85in | ▲ 270+10.6 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 5,743lb | 1,830lb | ▲ 270+3,913 lb · +214% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volt | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Leyland 270 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 68th percentile (75 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 62nd percentile (230 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,743 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,830 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 46th percentile (134 in)B · 11th percentile (103 in)
A · 270B · XJ25Median Utility Tractor