Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS K5055 vs LS R60
Image not recorded
LSLS K5055
vs
LSLS R60
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ R60 higher · +1 hp (+2%)K505555 hp
R6056 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
K5055 is in the 50th percentile; R60 is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ K5055 higher · +50 ci (+33%)K5055203 ci
R60153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
K5055 is in the 56th percentile; R60 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedK50554
R604
Median Utility Tractor4
K5055 is in the 50th percentile; R60 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ R60 higher · +24 (+300%)K50558
R6032
Median Utility Tractor12
K5055 is in the 23rd percentile; R60 is in the 97th · 4,941 models
K5055 (A)R60 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | K5055 | R60 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | LS | — |
| Model | S4S | S4QLT | — |
| Power Output | 55hp | 56hp | ▲ R60+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ R60+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 203ci | 153ci | ▲ K5055+50 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.5in | ▲ K5055+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.1in | ▲ K5055+0.6 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 136in | 126in | ▲ K5055+10 in · +8% |
| Width | 66in | 55.9in | ▲ K5055+10.1 in · +18% |
| Height | 105in | 95.1in | ▲ K5055+9.9 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 4,076lb | 3,660lb | ▲ K5055+416 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS R60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 50th percentile (55 hp)B · 51st percentile (56 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 56th percentile (203 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 38th percentile (4,076 lb)B · 31st percentile (3,660 lb)
A · K5055B · R60Median Utility Tractor