Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS K5055 vs LS XU55
Image not recorded
LSLS K5055
vs
LSLS XU55
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedK505555 hp
XU5555 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
K5055 is in the 50th percentile; XU55 is in the 50th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ K5055 higher · +68 ci (+50%)K5055203 ci
XU55135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
K5055 is in the 56th percentile; XU55 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedK50554
XU554
Median Utility Tractor4
K5055 is in the 50th percentile; XU55 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ XU55 higher · +8 (+100%)K50558
XU5516
Median Utility Tractor12
K5055 is in the 23rd percentile; XU55 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
K5055 (A)XU55 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | K5055 | XU55 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Model | S4S | N4LDI-TA-41 | — |
| Power Output | 55hp | 55hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ XU55+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 203ci | 135ci | ▲ K5055+68 ci · +50% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.3in | ▲ K5055+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 3.9in | ▲ K5055+0.8 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 136in | 142in | ▲ XU55+6 in · +4% |
| Width | 66in | 66.9in | ▲ XU55+0.9 in · +1% |
| Height | 105in | 103in | ▲ K5055+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 4,076lb | 4,674lb | ▲ XU55+598 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | LS K5055 | LS XU55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | cooled exhaust-gas recirculation (EGR) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 50th percentile (55 hp)B · 50th percentile (55 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 56th percentile (203 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 38th percentile (4,076 lb)B · 45th percentile (4,674 lb)
A · K5055B · XU55Median Utility Tractor