Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS KR50 vs LS XR4150
Image not recorded
LSLS KR50
vs
LSLS XR4150
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ XR4150 higher · +3 hp (+6%)KR5047 hp
XR415050 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
KR50 is in the 41st percentile; XR4150 is in the 45th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ KR50 higher · +38 ci (+33%)KR50153 ci
XR4150115 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
KR50 is in the 40th percentile; XR4150 is in the 28th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ KR50 higher · +1 (+33%)KR504
XR41503
Median Utility Tractor4
KR50 is in the 50th percentile; XR4150 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ KR50 higher · +16 (+100%)KR5032
XR415016
Median Utility Tractor12
KR50 is in the 97th percentile; XR4150 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
KR50 (A)XR4150 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | KR50 | XR4150 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | S4QL | L3C19-T | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 50hp | ▲ XR4150+3 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ KR50+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 153ci | 115ci | ▲ KR50+38 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.5in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Syncronized Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | 133in | ▲ XR4150+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 62.2in | 62.5in | ▲ XR4150+0.3 in · <1% |
| Height | 94.9in | 93in | ▲ KR50+1.9 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,759lb | 3,869lb | ▲ XR4150+110 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR4150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station with ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 45th percentile (50 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 40th percentile (153 ci)B · 28th percentile (115 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 97th percentile (32)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 33rd percentile (3,759 lb)B · 35th percentile (3,869 lb)
A · KR50B · XR4150Median Utility Tractor