Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS KR50 vs LS XR50
Image not recorded
LSLS KR50
vs
LSLS XR50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedKR5047 hp
XR5047 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
KR50 is in the 41st percentile; XR50 is in the 41st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedKR50153 ci
XR50153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
KR50 is in the 40th percentile; XR50 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedKR504
XR504
Median Utility Tractor4
KR50 is in the 50th percentile; XR50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ KR50 higher · +16 (+100%)KR5032
XR5016
Median Utility Tractor12
KR50 is in the 97th percentile; XR50 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
KR50 (A)XR50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | KR50 | XR50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | S4QL | S4QL | Same |
| Power Output | 47hp | 47hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 153ci | 153ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.5in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | 129in | ▲ XR50+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 62.2in | 62.4in | ▲ XR50+0.2 in · <1% |
| Height | 94.9in | 91.1in | ▲ KR50+3.8 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 3,759lb | 4,334lb | ▲ XR50+575 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS KR50 | LS XR50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station with ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 41st percentile (47 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 40th percentile (153 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 97th percentile (32)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 33rd percentile (3,759 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,334 lb)
A · KR50B · XR50Median Utility Tractor