Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS KR50 vs Massey Ferguson 145
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 145
Utility
- power
- 47 hp
- displacement
- 152 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
LSLS KR50
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedKR5047 hp
14547 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
KR50 is in the 41st percentile; 145 is in the 41st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ KR50 higher · +1 ci (<1%)KR50153 ci
145152 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
KR50 is in the 40th percentile; 145 is in the 39th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ KR50 higher · +1 (+33%)KR504
1453
Median Utility Tractor4
KR50 is in the 50th percentile; 145 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ KR50 higher · +20 (+167%)KR5032
14512
Median Utility Tractor12
KR50 is in the 97th percentile; 145 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
KR50 (A)145 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | KR50 | 145 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Perkins | — |
| Model | S4QL | AD 3.152 | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 47hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ KR50+350 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ KR50+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 153ci | 152ci | ▲ KR50+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.6in | ▲ 145+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 5in | ▲ 145+0.9 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | 118in | ▲ KR50+8 in · +7% |
| Width | 62.2in | 68.5in | ▲ 145+6.3 in · +10% |
| Height | 94.9in | 54.7in | ▲ KR50+40.2 in · +73% |
| Operating Weight | 3,759lb | 3,638lb | ▲ KR50+121 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS KR50 | Massey Ferguson 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station with ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 41st percentile (47 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 40th percentile (153 ci)B · 39th percentile (152 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 97th percentile (32)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 33rd percentile (3,759 lb)B · 31st percentile (3,638 lb)
A · KR50B · 145Median Utility Tractor