Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS KR60 vs LS Neo N53
LSLS KR60
vs
LSLS Neo N53
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Neo N53 higher · +1 hp (+2%)KR6056 hp
Neo N5357 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
KR60 is in the 51st percentile; Neo N53 is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Neo N53 higher · +50 ci (+33%)KR60153 ci
Neo N53203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
KR60 is in the 40th percentile; Neo N53 is in the 56th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedKR604
Neo N534
Median Utility Tractor4
KR60 is in the 50th percentile; Neo N53 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ KR60 higher · +16 (+100%)KR6032
Neo N5316
Median Utility Tractor12
KR60 is in the 97th percentile; Neo N53 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
KR60 (A)Neo N53 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS Neo N53 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | KR60 | Neo N53 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS Neo N53 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | S4QLT | S4S-D | — |
| Power Output | 56hp | 57hp | ▲ Neo N53+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ KR60+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 153ci | 203ci | ▲ Neo N53+50 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.7in | ▲ Neo N53+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 4.7in | ▲ Neo N53+0.6 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS Neo N53 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS Neo N53 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | 142in | ▲ Neo N53+16 in · +13% |
| Width | 62.2in | 55.4in | ▲ KR60+6.8 in · +12% |
| Height | 94.9in | 96.7in | ▲ Neo N53+1.8 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,759lb | 5,556lb | ▲ Neo N53+1,797 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS Neo N53 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS Neo N53 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I/II | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS Neo N53 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS Neo N53 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (56 hp)B · 51st percentile (57 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 40th percentile (153 ci)B · 56th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 97th percentile (32)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 33rd percentile (3,759 lb)B · 52nd percentile (5,556 lb)
A · KR60B · Neo N53Median Utility Tractor