Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS KR60 vs LS XU5055
LSLS KR60
vs
LSLS XU5055
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ KR60 higher · +1 hp (+2%)KR6056 hp
XU505555 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
KR60 is in the 51st percentile; XU5055 is in the 50th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ KR60 higher · +18 ci (+13%)KR60153 ci
XU5055135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
KR60 is in the 40th percentile; XU5055 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedKR604
XU50554
Median Utility Tractor4
KR60 is in the 50th percentile; XU5055 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ KR60 higher · +16 (+100%)KR6032
XU505516
Median Utility Tractor12
KR60 is in the 97th percentile; XU5055 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
KR60 (A)XU5055 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | KR60 | XU5055 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Shibarua | — |
| Model | S4QLT | N4LDI-TA | — |
| Power Output | 56hp | 55hp | ▲ KR60+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 153ci | 135ci | ▲ KR60+18 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.3in | ▲ KR60+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ KR60+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | 16-speed synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | 142in | ▲ XU5055+16 in · +13% |
| Width | 62.2in | 67in | ▲ XU5055+4.8 in · +8% |
| Height | 94.9in | 103in | ▲ XU5055+8.1 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 3,759lb | 4,674lb | ▲ XU5055+915 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | EGR (exhaust-gas recirculation) | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS KR60 | LS XU5055 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (56 hp)B · 50th percentile (55 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 40th percentile (153 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 97th percentile (32)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 33rd percentile (3,759 lb)B · 45th percentile (4,674 lb)
A · KR60B · XU5055Median Utility Tractor