Image not recorded
LSModel A
LS LT280D
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Sub-Compact
LS LT280D vs LS MT125
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS MT125
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
LSLS LT280D
vs
LSLS MT125
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ LT280D higher · +3.3 hp (+13%)LT280D28 hp
MT12524.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
LT280D is in the 53rd percentile; MT125 is in the 43rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ LT280D higher · +14.3 ci (+19%)LT280D91.5 ci
MT12577.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
LT280D is in the 52nd percentile; MT125 is in the 37th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ LT280D higher · +1 (+33%)LT280D4
MT1253
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
LT280D is in the 90th percentile; MT125 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ LT280D higher · +1,973 lb (+137%)LT280D3,417 lb
MT1251,444 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
LT280D is in the 64th percentile; MT125 is in the 19th · 711 models
LT280D (A)MT125 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | LT280D | MT125 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | S4L | 3TNV80F | — |
| Power Output | 28hp | 24.7hp | ▲ LT280D+3.3 hp · +13% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ MT125+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ LT280D+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 91.5ci | 77.2ci | ▲ LT280D+14.3 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.2in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.3in | ▲ MT125+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 130in | 97in | ▲ LT280D+33 in · +34% |
| Width | 52in | 47in | ▲ LT280D+5 in · +11% |
| Height | 87.5in | 87in | ▲ LT280D+0.5 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 3,417lb | 1,444lb | ▲ LT280D+1,973 lb · +137% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Category I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS LT280D | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 53rd percentile (28 hp)B · 43rd percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 52nd percentile (91.5 ci)B · 37th percentile (77.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 64th percentile (3,417 lb)B · 19th percentile (1,444 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 80th percentile (130 in)B · 25th percentile (97 in)
A · LT280DB · MT125Median Sub-Compact Tractor