Image not recorded
LSModel A
LS MT125
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS MT125 vs LS XJ25
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS XJ25
Utility
- power
- 24.4 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
LSLS MT125
vs
LSLS XJ25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT125 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)MT12524.7 hp
XJ2524.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT125 is in the 15th percentile; XJ25 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ XJ25 higher · +3.2 ci (+4%)MT12577.2 ci
XJ2580.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT125 is in the 11th percentile; XJ25 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT1253
XJ253
Median Utility Tractor4
MT125 is in the 23rd percentile; XJ25 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ XJ25 higher · +386 lb (+27%)MT1251,444 lb
XJ251,830 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT125 is in the 5th percentile; XJ25 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
MT125 (A)XJ25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | MT125 | XJ25 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 3TNV80F | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 24.7hp | 24.4hp | ▲ MT125+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ MT125+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 77.2ci | 80.4ci | ▲ XJ25+3.2 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.6in | ▲ XJ25+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 97in | 103in | ▲ XJ25+6 in · +6% |
| Width | 47in | 44.9in | ▲ MT125+2.1 in · +5% |
| Height | 87in | 85in | ▲ MT125+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 1,444lb | 1,830lb | ▲ XJ25+386 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS MT125 | LS XJ25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.2 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,444 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,830 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 7th percentile (97 in)B · 11th percentile (103 in)
A · MT125B · XJ25Median Utility Tractor