Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS XR50 vs Massey Ferguson 415
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 415
Utility
- power
- 46 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
LSLS XR50
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 415
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ XR50 higher · +1 hp (+2%)XR5047 hp
41546 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
XR50 is in the 41st percentile; 415 is in the 40th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedXR50153 ci
415153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
XR50 is in the 40th percentile; 415 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ XR50 higher · +1 (+33%)XR504
4153
Median Utility Tractor4
XR50 is in the 50th percentile; 415 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ XR50 higher · +8 (+100%)XR5016
4158
Median Utility Tractor12
XR50 is in the 73rd percentile; 415 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
XR50 (A)415 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | XR50 | 415 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Perkins | — |
| Model | S4QL | AD3.152 | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 46hp | ▲ XR50+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ XR50+350 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ XR50+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 153ci | 153ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.6in | ▲ 415+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 5in | ▲ 415+0.9 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Sliding spur gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 151in | ▲ 415+22 in · +17% |
| Width | 62.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.1in | 96.1in | ▲ 415+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 4,334lb | 4,475lb | ▲ 415+141 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS XR50 | Massey Ferguson 415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 40th percentile (46 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 40th percentile (153 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 41st percentile (4,334 lb)B · 43rd percentile (4,475 lb)
A · XR50B · 415Median Utility Tractor