Head to head · Utility
LS XU5055 vs McCormick Intl X10.55M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.55M
Utility
- power
- 54 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 12
LSLS XU5055
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.55M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ XU5055 higher · +1 hp (+2%)XU505555 hp
X10.55M54 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
XU5055 is in the 50th percentile; X10.55M is in the 49th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ XU5055 higher · +1 ci (<1%)XU5055135 ci
X10.55M134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
XU5055 is in the 33rd percentile; X10.55M is in the 32nd · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ XU5055 higher · +4 (+33%)XU505516
X10.55M12
Median Utility Tractor12
XU5055 is in the 73rd percentile; X10.55M is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.55M higher · +121 lb (+3%)XU50554,674 lb
X10.55M4,795 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
XU5055 is in the 45th percentile; X10.55M is in the 46th · 5,107 models
XU5055 (A)X10.55M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | XU5055 | X10.55M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibarua | Daedong | — |
| Model | N4LDI-TA | 4A220TLWB | — |
| Power Output | 55hp | 54hp | ▲ XU5055+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 135ci | 134ci | ▲ XU5055+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed synchro shuttle | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 142in | 131in | ▲ XU5055+11 in · +8% |
| Width | 67in | 69.3in | ▲ X10.55M+2.3 in · +3% |
| Height | 103in | 107in | ▲ X10.55M+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 4,674lb | 4,795lb | ▲ X10.55M+121 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.5-20 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9-28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | EGR (exhaust-gas recirculation) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS XU5055 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 50th percentile (55 hp)B · 49th percentile (54 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 33rd percentile (135 ci)B · 32nd percentile (134 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 45th percentile (4,674 lb)B · 46th percentile (4,795 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 57th percentile (142 in)B · 42nd percentile (131 in)
A · XU5055B · X10.55MMedian Utility Tractor